A Scottish priest who says that his vocation was "destroyed" after he
spoke out against sexual abuse is to claim unfair dismissal against the
Catholic church at an employment tribunal.
Father Patrick Lawson,
who was removed from St Sophia's parish church, in Galston, Ayrshire, in
September by the Bishop of Galloway, John Cunningham, has been granted
legal aid to pursue the case that could establish employment rights for
priests across Britain.
"An application has been lodged on
Patrick's behalf with the tribunal," said his solicitor, Cameron Fyfe.
"He is breaking new ground as there has never been a decision by a UK
court on this. If he is successful, it would open the door to other
priests in a similar position."
The Catholic church's director of
communications, Peter Kearney, says the application is inappropriate:
"For such a claim to be made, there would need to be an
employer/employee relationship. Since the relationship between a priest
and his diocese is not one of employment, reference to an employment
tribunal would not be possible."
The application is the latest move in a long-running dispute. In July, Lawson revealed to the Observer that
he had been fighting for 17 years for appropriate action to be taken
against a fellow priest who he claims sexually assaulted him and abused
altar boys. He was issued with a disciplinary warning for giving the
interview.
"The church still cannot handle the truth," he told the
paper. "For 17 years I have tried to get them to reach out to those who
have been broken by abuse. All they do is protect the institution."
Lawson
was dismissed after he had been unwell for a period following a cancer
diagnosis, during which the bishop refused to allow him to reduce his
workload. In a decree of removal, Cunningham wrote that Lawson's health
had "prevented him exercising his ministry satisfactorily" and that
removal was "justified and necessary for the good of souls".
The
bishop cited 23 letters of complaint from the parish and said the priest
had therefore "sustained the loss of his good reputation". However, the
bishop also received more than 200 submissions of support from
parishioners, some of whom walked out of mass when Lawson's removal was
announced.
"The diocese's orchestrated campaign against me has
left me no choice but to fight a civil case," says Lawson, who is also
pursuing a Canon Law case in Rome. "The case in Rome could take years. I
only had three months from the time of dismissal to take civil action,
so I couldn't afford to wait. There has been so much personal pain
involved that I need justice. I feel so desperate that I have served,
and been willing to serve, the church, yet have been personally attacked
in this way."
Fyfe says the issue of whether a priest is an
employee is likely to be referred to the court of session. In 2005, the
House of Lords ruled in favour of a Church of Scotland
minister when her superiors tried to argue she was employed by God. A
ruling that an employment tribunal could hear a Church of England
minister's case was also made just last month, but there is no precedent
governing the Catholic church.
"The crucial question," argues
Fyfe, "is the right to dismiss. How can you say a person is
self-employed but you have the right to dismiss?"
If the
employment issue goes to the Court of Session, it is likely to take at
least a year. If, however, it is ultimately ruled that the tribunal can
hear the case, employment rights for priests will be established even if
Lawson loses his personal application for unfair dismissal.
The
civil case reflects a growing sense among some priests and laity that
external scrutiny of church affairs is necessary. George Gardner, a
former parishioner of Lawson's, said: "In my view, the church in
Scotland has not proved itself capable of being honest and open about
wrongdoing and therefore an outside perspective is something I would
support."
There are also fears that despite the Scottish church's
publication of abuse audits, the figures are inaccurate. Both Lawson and
Father Gerry Magee of St Winin's in Kilwinning, also in Ayrshire have
paperwork showing complaints made in 2006 against a bishop about claims
of psychological abuse. Neither complaint is officially recorded. in the
published figures.
"I feel aggrieved about it," says Magee. "Our
church, our faith, have been disgraced by the very people who are
supposed to uphold it: the bishops. They are defending the
indefensible."Peter Kearney says the audits are "not a static recording
exercise, rather an active work in progress. They are designed to be
amended and revised in the light of historical reports and complaints
whenever they are made."
0 comments:
Post a Comment